"Comprised of": point/ counterpoint

It seems like we're constantly changing this.

It seems like we're constantly changing this.

Hey, all you grammatical pedants out there: Check out this article about a Wikipedia editor named Bryan Henderson, who has made it his mission to eradicate "comprised of" from our favorite online encyclopedia.

Then, here's The Guardian's David Shariatmadari offering his viewpoint on why Henderson's efforts are misguided.

After you've finished reading both, please stop writing "comprised of". For example, America comprises 50 states; it is not comprised of 50 states. Use it like you would use "include": The bigger thing includes, or comprises, the smaller things. You wouldn't say "is included of", would you?

And then go grab a beer. It's Friday.

 

Is this literally, or figuratively the best invention ever?

Hey Google Chrome users: You can now download an extension that changes the word "literally" to "figuratively" on the websites you visit, since 99% of the time that the former is used, the latter is what is really meant.

For instance, a quick Google News search for 'literally' turns up the following headlines, modified by the browser extension to a state of unintentional accuracy:

The internet is awesome.